19th July 2014 9:26
photoset ♥ 3,085 notes
► tagged
► reblogged from thebritishteapot (originally anindoorkitty)

anindoorkitty:

Happy Birthday, Benedict!

Celebrating 65 appearances since July 19, 1976

19th July 2014 1:48
photoset ♥ 31,583 notes
► tagged
► reblogged from ruinedcave (originally sherlygifs)
19th July 2014 1:47
quote ♥ 5,237 notes
► reblogged from her-spookiness (originally exgynocraticgrrl)

The kick of girl-girl porno lies partly in its catering to the fantasy of violating the privacy of lesbians, of making even sex between women - something quite threatening to male sexual prerogative-serve a male agenda; the other, tacit element is the kick of seeing “normal”girls made to emulate homosexual activity. The assumption is that homosexual activity is repulsive, and that therefore the models are disgusted by it and endure it under some compulsion - whether the compulsion of money, force of personality, or physical threat.

Pictures of real lesbians - at Gay Pride rallies, for example - kissing, necking and flirting are often considered disgusting and ugly by the same men who enjoy girl-girl fantasy porn.

Lesbians in the public world who kiss, hold hands, or otherwise behave like a sexually intimate couple (in a restaurant, in a park, at a movie) have often been subjected to abuse, threats and violence from hetero men - the same men who constitute the market for ever-popular girl-girl porno.

Catharine A. Mackinnon, Elizabeth A. Long Professor of Law at the University of Michigan, (edited by Christine Stark & Rebecca Whisnant), “Not For Sale: Feminists Resisting Prostitution & Pornography.” 2004. (p. 198)

19th July 2014 1:43
text ♥ 7,859 notes
► tagged
► reblogged from killthefez (originally lornacrowleys)

lornacrowleys:

dont even bother with a pairing if you cannot plausibly visualize a melodramatic ‘how to save a life’ amv about it. you can substitute ‘over my head’ in a pinch but my point still stands

19th July 2014 0:07
audio ♥ 249,353 notes
► tagged
► reblogged from thedetectivedoesntdance (originally captain-boomerang)
1,988,845 plays
18th July 2014 23:35
text ♥ 59 notes
► tagged
► reblogged from tripleness (originally tripleness)

Charlie Weasley – or ‘The Unmarried Weasley’ as he is often known - is a burly chap carrying several burns due to his work with dragons. Like his sister-in-law Hermione ‘Bored Yawn’ Granger, he is paying little attention to the match, preferring what seems to be a most interesting talk with Rolf Scamander, husband of ‘Loony’ Lovegood. How difficult it has been to marry ‘into’ Dumbledore’s Army we can only speculate. Nobody who witnessed it will ever forget the shock on Scamander’s face when he saw Lovegood’s wedding dress – rainbows, spangles and a tiara of silver unicorn horns, voted ‘Most Hideous Outfit of the Year’ by readers of my regular Daily Prophet column. While Lovegood and Scamander appear to be holding hands in the VIP box, this might well be because Rolf is trying to prevent his wife from putting on one of her famous Special Event Hats.

18th July 2014 23:33
text ♥ 69 notes
► tagged
► reblogged from sirius-lupin (originally sirius-lupin)

sirius-lupin:

reading the new article written by jk rowling on how dumbledore’s army went to the quidditch world cup literally almost made me cry. literally me

image

kinda-sorta-not-really-alice:

guys. guYS. GUYS. 

NEVILLE IS ALBUS’S GODFATHER. 

18th July 2014 14:36
text ♥ 9,105 notes
► tagged
► reblogged from thedetectivedoesntdance (originally vvhitehouse)

vvhitehouse:

what i really, really love about oitnb is that all the white men have the most boring fucking plot lines like I literally groan aloud when healy tries to talk to his wife and what’s larry up to these days? no one fucking cares. it’s like they’re not even trying and that’s really refreshing

17th July 2014 18:45
photoset ♥ 8,968 notes
► tagged
► reblogged from greeenarrow (originally iamnevertheone)

are you okay?